How do you design good pages if you don't have any photos?

When is it OK to run screens behind a story? Or is a white background always best?

Is there software that can make charts and graphs?

What are the
best grids for newspapers to use?

How many stories should run on a typical front page?

Should you use rules to separate stories?

Is it OK to use grip-and-grin photos in the paper?

What’s wrong with using pretty stand-alone photos as lead art on Page One?

What's the best way to make a map?

Is it true what our photo editor says — that running type on photos and cutting photos out damages their integrity?

Is it wrong to use decorative fonts to create feature headlines?

Is it possible to design good pages without big, dominant photos?

Your observation about that lefthand promo rail is correct -- most papers that tried it have jettisoned it (or desperately want to). The problems outweight the benefits, the problems being:

 

Have a question
for the design
doctor? Got
a squabble
you need to
settle? Send
in a question
by clicking here.

—-- if the rail is wide enough to be effective, it gets in the way of the layout and seriously reduces your full-page design options;

— no matter how wide it is, the promo rail can't accommodate big or wide images; and

— it turns into wallpaper very quickly, which means it can easily become invisible to the reader. (That’s the main reason we killed the Page One rail years ago at The Oregonian, at right — it became unredeemably stale after just a few months. Also, the publisher had this thing for yellow, even though the entire newsroom found it gagworthy.)

Yes, if you want effective promos, you pretty much need to run them horizontally. That way, you can vary the number (say, from one huge promo to maybe 3 or 4 on any given day). You can vary the promo headline treatments. You can use type only, or cutouts, or — well, you get the point.

Variety is key; if you don't keep them fresh, they'll quickly turn back into wallpaper. (Or to put it another way: If you don’t care about your promos, your readers won’t, either.)

As for top vs. bottom, the thinking now seems to be: are you trying to sell papers, or just get the reader excited about what's inside? Unless you're in a competitive market battling it out at the newsstand, forget about using promos to sell papers. They won't. Only huge, loud and sexy promos sell papers, and those may be massive space-wasters for you. Instead, think of promos as a sort of super-index. And if you run them at the bottom of the page, readers can see them just fine. You can even vary the depth from issue to issue, if you want to.

I'd vote, above all, for maximum flexibility in promos. Keep them surprising, keep them lively, and keep the images appealing.

timharrower.com logo
INSIDE REPORTING
handbook
biography
design doctor
other stuff
the edge
contact us
back to home page
workshops